Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kumar Keshav

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:03, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kumar Keshav

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is the third time this biography of a non-notable administrator has been created by an WP:SPA, by Akash2208 (talk · contribs), Ramsingh21194 (talk · contribs) and now Kakuincity (talk · contribs). It's no more than a CV and reeks of UPE. Cabayi (talk) 10:52, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 10:52, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 10:52, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 10:52, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - as per nom; the refs just don't demonstrate notability. Ingratis (talk) 11:34, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete clearly not notable. It is high time we created a minimum number of edits a user has to make before they can create a new article. New users are tempted to create new articles on new subjects but usually have to little grasp of notability guidelines and create articles on subjects not justified. My first article I created was deleted, and I think that was baiscally my first edit. It was on Phoebe Whitmore Carter (Woodruff) who considering how heavily she is mentioned in both volume 1 and Volume 2 of Saints:A History of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints might merit an article. Currently she is redirected to the article on her husband, but a seperate article, especially considering that one of her letters was published in an anthology might be justifieiable, especially considering there is a desire to have better coverage of women. Woodruff was also a key figure in sufferage and protesting the unjust outside colonialist oppresion of the residents of Utah Territory. When I first created the article back in 2006 some of the now extant sources of secondary coverage on Woodruff did not yet exist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:33, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.