Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kumar Mukherjee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:44, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kumar Mukherjee

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable musician. The article was written without any references and mainly based on the musician's personal webiste which is no longer available. No secondary references, no notable coverages, in no way satisfies WP:SINGER. Dixiku (talk) 20:41, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Dixiku (talk) 20:41, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:43, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I found some additional references and added them. I also used InternetArchiveBot at https://iabot.toolforge.org/index.php to recover the pages from the musician's personal website and added those archived pages to the article. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 22:00, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Hey Eastmain, can you highlight which references do you think are helping with notability? At first look, I felt it failed. But seeing your comment, I might be missing something. Please list them here at this discussion. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 00:56, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:33, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:25, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The sources added by Eastmain are mostly not independent and unreliable. Those that are not consist of trivial coverage. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:MUSICBIO.4meter4 (talk) 23:21, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom fails WP:GNG and WP:SINGER.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:14, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: lacks significant coverage WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:GNG defcon5 (talk) 08:35, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.