Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kunsthall Trondheim

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Modussiccandi (talk) 07:49, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kunsthall Trondheim

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Setting aside the list of exhibitions, this article contains more than close paraphrasing. The prose is a full copyvio, albeit with a few small edits and some order changes. See this report. If I removed those portions and asked for a copyvio revdel then we would not have an article. If I nominated it for speedy deletion then everything goes. It has been flagged as "Close Paraphrasing" of that source article since June 2021 and I doubt we will get a good rewrite any time soon, thus this nomination for deletion. I believe this article deserves discussion. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:14, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts, Geography, and Norway. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:14, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry but I had to remove most of the content, as it was copyvio, added back in 2010. Old revisions prior to that date don't contain any info that would show this gallery is notable. The content I removed was routine coverage copied from their website. — Diannaa (talk) 22:04, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment in view of the removal of copyvio magterial I feel it is important to revise my deletiom rationale. As Diannaa has stated, there is nothing available to suggest this passes WP:GNG, thus this should now be the deletion rationale. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 05:14, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:14, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The quality of the article has no bearing on the notability of the subject. The institution is quite young, but has received critical attention in the art press. As Artform recently wrote about Stefanie Hessler she departed for a post in Switzerland: Norway’s Kunsthall Trondheim, where she was instrumental in creating for the museum an engaging program at the intersections of ecology and society which garnered international recognition. Vexations (talk) 21:12, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. Vexations (talk) 21:13, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: There are many news articles on exhibitions at the institution (its main purpose and activity, including in the article), meeting WP:GNG and WP:ORG. —Jonathan Bowen (talk) 15:45, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:20, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.