Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LEOs (RTOS)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (X! · talk) · @745 · 16:53, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

LEOs (RTOS)

Pretty blatant advertising for obscure embedded Linux distro. I don't see any coverage of this anywhere, or evidence that it's notable in any way. —Chowbok ☠ 18:10, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Yet another linux distro. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 21:39, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:22, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep or Merge to Texas Instruments or similar topic. It seems to be mentioned at an official TI page [1], so I would say this had some notability. But I have to admit I am not an expert on the topic. SF007 (talk)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like advertising. Delete. Alexius08 (talk) 00:20, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Dennis The Tiger, YALD sounds like a great distro name; shall we make one and the create a page on it? :-) Point is, a "distro" is not inherently notable unless it receives significant coverage. This one doesn't have such coverage. Chzz ► 01:13, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Too late [2] Gigs (talk) 02:16, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Dammit! =) --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 18:51, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Aside from no claim to notability, there are no sources, nor is a newsgroup ref persuasive. Shadowjams (talk) 09:11, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.