Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love Bites (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 02:04, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Love Bites (band)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This isn't notable at all!! Drlemon98 (talk) 20:53, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 August 31. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:05, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Transclusion was partially created for Love Bites (without (band)). I fixed the links and removed the AfD tag from Love Bites (DAB page) GermanJoe (talk) 21:13, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 22:02, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe delete as my searches found nothing particularly good (best was this) and the chartings were likely the most notable thing. SwisterTwister talk 03:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:46, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep meets WP:MUSIC criteria, sources provide sufficient information. Peter James (talk) 23:07, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 10:45, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:12, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Charted in top 20. Coverage in multiple independent reliable sources some of which have been added to the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:50, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.