Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ma'am Magazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. L Faraone 01:38, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ma'am Magazine

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not notable, no secondary sources --Addi hockey 10 ^e-mail 00:57, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:02, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:02, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No reliable 3rd party coverage found (Google, Highbeam, Questia) that could establish notability. AllyD (talk) 06:19, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:00, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 10:43, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. czar · · 10:46, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No references, does not meet GNG or N or V. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 03:25, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.