Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madam X (2016 film)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No prejudice against recreating if the project becomes more definite and gets reliable sourcing. MelanieN (talk) 02:22, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- Madam X (2016 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
Per WP:CRYSTAL, its just a speculation on a project. We need to wait until something substantial happens, i.e filming begins. Yashthepunisher (talk) 06:39, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:27, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:27, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- searching 'alts' with WP:INDAFD: "Madam X Movie" "Huma Qureshi" "Tigmanshu Dhulia" "Anurag Kashyap"
- Delete or userfy for now as being somewhat TOO SOON. As WP:CRYSTAL specifically allows future topics and events to be spoken of if properly sourced, and as the project IS getting coverage in such as India Today, Times of India (1), Times of India (2), and Bollywood Hungama, we can allow it back when we have confirmation of filming. Schmidt, Michael Q. 11:12, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 14:04, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.