Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Markus Dupree

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:25, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Markus Dupree

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced porn star BLP, who fails WP:BASIC and WP:ENT. RS citations in the article don't support the facts asserted or are trivial in nature. Independent searches for RS coverage yield allegations of bad conduct coming mainly from one podcast. The coverage is not very deep and the sources are less than blue chip quality. The scene-related porn award wins would not even have satisfied the now-superseded PORNBIO SNG. • Gene93k (talk) 04:56, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:56, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:56, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:56, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:57, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:35, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable --TheImaCow (talk) 16:09, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable pornographic performer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:00, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:GNG; search for his Russian name " shows several dozens articles in news sources of different quality.Ipsign (talk) 15:50, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Ipsign - Plenty of sources under their Russian name (Can't read Russian but I assume most if not all are fine and usable). –Davey2010^Talk 13:53, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sulfurboy (talk) 08:13, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Ipsign. He has significant coverage in news sources under a Cyrillic search. [1][2][3] Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:32, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.