Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masum Parvez Rubel (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. KTC (talk) 21:28, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Masum Parvez Rubel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable as actor or martial artist. Last AfD was labelled no-consensus due to lack of interest.Peter Rehse (talk) 13:33, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 13:33, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article shows no significant coverage from any independent source and there's no evidence he meets the notability criteria for actors or martial artists.Jakejr (talk) 18:40, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (gossip) @ 21:49, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (gossip) @ 21:50, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep- Popular Bangladeshi actor. Although inactive in recent years. He was active in 1990s, so online sources are unavailable for him. - Rahat (Talk * Contributions) 16:03, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have added some references also. - Rahat (Talk * Contributions) 16:06, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

weak delete the sources added verify existence, but none are third party significant coverage. (the third party sources are trivial passing mentions and the significant coverage is the website for an organization with which he is closely affiliated.) Even if he did them years ago, in the 15 years that everything has been on the internets, if he was indeed a major player, someone should have mentioned his significance.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:59, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep- famous and popular Bangladeshi film actor. He has appeared over 200 films. As he was active in 1990s, so online sources are hard to find. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 05:16, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per WP:NACTOR, had significant roles in multiple notable films. --Zayeem ^(talk) 10:44, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Film notability or significance of roles not supported by references.Peter Rehse (talk) 11:08, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Definitely doesn't meet any of the martial arts notability criteria. The sources given do not provide the significant independent coverage required by WP:GNG and there's no supporting evidence for the claim he's a notable actor. Should references be provided to support a claim of notability I will reconsider my vote. Papaursa (talk) 03:54, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep - He is a noted Bangladeshi film actor who was mostly active in 1990s films and he is also a reputed martial artist with several awards. He is also president of three Karate organizations in Bangladesh. The article requires a major edits. Happiest persoN (talk) 20:40, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. References are all to either unreliable sources, or barely mention subject of article. Notability is not established under WP:GNG. Under WP:NACTOR, he may have had significant roles in films, but there is no indication in the article nor references that the films are notable. The article provides no information about him as a martial artist. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 01:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable as a martial artist and lacks the coverage to meet GNG. There's no support for the claim he's a notable actor.Mdtemp (talk) 21:09, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.