Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melody (Brazilian singer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Star Mississippi 23:45, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Melody (Brazilian singer)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

after removing the unsourced stuff, appears to fail WP:NMUSIC: only non-independent sources (the EGO piece is an interview, the entretenimento piece is a photo gallery of her sister, two youtube videos (of the songs)) and a list of recipients of some awards from a single ceremony (most of which don't appear to be major per NMUSIC criteria 7), a search turned up nothing other than the usual spotify, youtube etc which are not reliable and interviews Lavalizard101 (talk) 15:01, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Lavalizard101 (talk) 15:01, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Lavalizard101 (talk) 15:01, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Lavalizard101 (talk) 15:01, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, notability is based on her being a controversial child artist. Passes WP:NBASIC, with significant coverage found in the references at pt:Melody_(cantora). SailingInABathTub (talk) 00:27, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it passes WP:NBASIC and the first criteria in WP:NMUSIC. User:Tetizeraz. Send me a ✉️ ! 18:01, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:57, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, for the reasons those who want to keep this article. Davidgoodheart (talk) 01:14, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.