Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Bauman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. - Mailer Diablo 02:44, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Bauman

Delete per Wikipedia:Autobiography -- Eagle^a^mⁿ 19:16, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and cleanup. Major scholar with numerous books at Amazon. [1]. -- JJay 21:12, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- From the autobiography policy page: "If you or your achievements are verifiable and notable; and are thus are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will create an article about you sooner or later." The reason for listing the article for deletion is not non-notability, it's the fact that it's an autobiography. - Eagle^a^mⁿ 21:30, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Any problem can be cleaned up. Like you, I am also well aware of the official ~~policy~~ guidelines here. -- JJay 21:40, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well, my comment was intended for next voters. - Eagle^a^mⁿ 21:50, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as notable theologian with numbers of books to his credit. Capitalistroadster 22:27, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, articles are not deleted just because they begin as autobiographies. See Cyrus Farivar Kappa 23:12, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and cleanup. Being an autobiography is not a criterion for deletion. howcheng [ t  c  w  e ] 00:57, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sufficiently notable given his publication history. --GrantNeufeld 06:34, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.