Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MicroERD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui 雲‍水 15:05, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MicroERD

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I placed a PROD tag on this article for having no sources - it was removed and no sources were added, so here we are. This is a software product that was launched last month, and it seems that no third parties anywhere have taken notice of it - I can find no sources other than it's own website. I think it does not meet the general notability guideline and the article should be deleted. MrOllie (talk) 12:58, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Clarkcj12 (talk) 15:11, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I would have to agree and it also fails WP:NSOFT which is a guideline for software notability. --Clarkcj12 (talk) 15:14, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No evidence of notability. AllyD (talk) 20:28, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Software article of unclear notability. Lacks independent RS references. A search did not reveal any significant coverage. Created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 21:27, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.