Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microquest Inc.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 01:58, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Microquest Inc.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSOFT. Lacks independent references and has since its creation. One independent source found with GNews mentions it in passing but doesn't support any claims made in the Wikipedia article. clpo13_(talk) 02:01, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 02:02, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 02:02, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 02:36, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I simply see no better improvement. Pinging Dialectric and Hillbillyholiday and I would've also notified Enfcer but they're not noticeable active. SwisterTwister talk 04:36, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Yeah, four years without decent refs is too long. Bin it. Hillbillyholiday ^talk 04:40, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 04:48, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - It's a small (but real) software company with on product: HealthQuest. The company may not be notable, but the product sure is. Try searching for Healthquest + billing or EMR (electronic medical record). Some very large hospitals rely on it. Jonathunder (talk) 00:35, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I tried your search terms and turned up no RS sources, just incidental mentions and info on unrelated companies in California and New York. If you have found reliable sources for this topic, please list them here.Dialectric (talk) 05:25, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.