Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Beauty Internet Universe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW hoax. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 20:44, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Beauty Internet Universe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced, unable to locate any references which establish notability. Zujua (talk) 09:52, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I initially PRODed the first couple of articles until I realized there were a whole slew of related articles and subpages by the the same creator. I've searched for the name of the competition and several of the names listed, with no significant results. These are all pretty substantial-looking lists, so I felt like I might be missing something and thought I should put it up for discussion. Here are the other related pages:

Whew. Zujua (talk) 10:09, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all - these articles appear to be a hoax, not only no notability but nothing whatsoever about the contest or contestants can be found. It was created by a user with the name "Miss Internet Beauty Universe". JoshuSasori (talk) 10:05, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: the preceding !vote by JoshuSasori was cast before I added the other related pages. JoshuSasori, please indicate if you've seen this and haven't changed your mind. Zujua (talk) 10:11, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't looked at all of these articles, what would make me change my mind? JoshuSasori (talk)

Just making sure, since the discussion had changed since you had last looked at it. Zujua (talk) 19:31, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. Other than the Wikipedia entries, nothing for this pageant comes up at all. There's zero results to show that this ever existed, let alone is notable.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 10:25, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly as you say, but since it is called "Miss Beauty Internet Universe", the fact that nothing can be found about it on the internet suggests it is an obvious hoax. Is there a speedy delete criterion which applies here? JoshuSasori (talk) 12:26, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:33, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all per WP:NOTADIRECTORY. Qworty (talk) 20:54, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Hoax, anyone? A search for "Miss Beauty Internet Universe" -wikipedia got zero hits. It might qualify for CSD G3, although I'm not sure if it's blatant enough. Braincricket (talk) 22:57, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all No proof of notability....William 01:42, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note The following are Confirmed as each other:

Miss Beauty Internet Universe (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Miss Queen World (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

All articles created by the latter should be considered for deletion as well. Moreover, this AfD and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Queen World are directly related to each other. --MuZemike 06:09, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. I don't know whether these articles are a hoax, but there is no evidence of any coverage in [[WP:|RS|reliable sources]], so we have nothing which might help to demonstrate notability. In fact, we don't even have any evidence that this pageant ever existed. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 08:26, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the related articles have already been shown a hoax. Ducknish (talk) 21:46, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It is absolutely an indication of a hoax when what is presumably an internet based beauty contest has no website that is provided in the article or that could be found in a Google search, and has managed to escape the notice of both reliable and unreliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 17:06, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.