Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MobiFiles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:16, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MobiFiles

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable software. Refs provided are all primary and the software was only initially released last February Night Ranger (talk) 23:43, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I struggle to believe that a piece of software released last month has had any significant and lasting impact on technology or society. The only two references are primary sources, so I don't think it's notable, and the article seems to be promotional: "MobiFiles is known for it's ease of use, and the backwards compatibility to Windows 2000 with the Microsoft .NET package." ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 11:46, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:35, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I PRODed the article after trying to find sources. I still can't find any. SmartSE (talk) 15:43, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No coverage in reliable sources.-- Whpq (talk) 14:38, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I found no sources I could consider reliable, which actually isn't unexpected, as the initial release of the software happened 35 days ago. Seems to be the case of WP:MILL (or at least WP:TOOSOON). — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 17:50, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.