Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Hosseini (computer scientist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 02:46, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mohammad Hosseini (computer scientist)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of meeting WP:SCHOLAR or other WP:GNG : still apparently in grad school, and I don't think scholarships and junior ACM awards (apparently a "student travel award") make the cut. The subject's Google Scholar profile doesn't support a significant impact in his field. This person may one day become a noted scholar, but until then we should not have an article. --Animalparty-- (talk) 05:20, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Probably a promising student, but the article is a BLP that references no independent reliable sources, and none seem to be available. DPRoberts534 (talk) 05:41, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as no evidence of notability, Fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 05:52, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Given his age, he seems to be a prominent young researcher. Googling "mobile texture streaming" suggests that almost all results in the first page are his contributions. I'm in favor of keeping this page User:arianaa30 (talk) 11:41, 21 February 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.126.255.6 (talk) [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:03, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:04, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious delete. A First-year Ph.D. student, far too soon to have accumulated any academic notability per WP:PROF. Student awards such as he lists are explicitly discounted by WP:PROF, and there is no other evidence of notability. Note: there are other people with almost the same name, making it very difficult to search for publications by the subject, but it's not a good sign that his web page's "publications" sub-page is empty. Searching Google scholar for mobile "texture streaming" as suggested above does turn up three pubs, but they all have single-digit citations, far far below the threshold for notability in a high-citation subject. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:46, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.