Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monophonics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (Soft delete, minding low participation.) czar ⨹ 13:37, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Monophonics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable band. I declined a CSD A7 because there were some sources and a claim to hit #1 in Greece. However, said claim is not in the source given and I can't find anything else of note aside from an entry in AllMusic that says they've released one album on a small reissue label. There are a quite a few mentions of the band in the local press, mostly interviews, so they pass the WP:GARAGE criteria, but not really enough to meet WP:NMUSIC. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 09:48, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The one article in Rock Revolt magazine could be considered independent coverage, but it's the only case, and it is unclear what the nature of that website is (whether significant, editorial-reviewed content or just a slickly designed blog). More evidence of significant coverage would be needed. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:31, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:48, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:31, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.