Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NCPHOBBIES.com
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedily deleted by RHaworth per CSD A7 (does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject). (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 19:01, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- NCPHOBBIES.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This, whether intended or not, is not notable and is borderline promotional (but blatant enough for A7 & G11) and my searches found nothing better than a Books result; I could've PROD'd this but I wanted comments. Pinging taggers @Ajmint and AllyD: for comment. SwisterTwister talk 06:09, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 03:44, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 03:44, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 03:44, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - The company doesn't seem particularly notable. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 23:50, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
