Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NGO Nayi Umeed (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The AfD for this highly promotional article is notable because the keep voters, unfortunately, do not present a single valid policy-based reason to keep the article. What we have left, then, is a consensus of editors pointing out that there are no reliable sources to prove that the subject is notable by our standards. Drmies (talk) 20:49, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NGO Nayi Umeed

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One eye-donation camp and a candle-light march for earthquake relief. Doesn't pass WP:ORG and WP:GNG. Last AfD was closed as no consensus. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:32, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

COMMENT: I don't know enough about the subject in question to make a nomination, but I do notice this does not very well meet Wikipedia's standards. The gallery for example does not belong on Wikipedia. If this article is kept, it needs to be moved to Wikicommons. I also notice large parts of the article are not cited, or at least do not use in-line citations. If this article is kept or otherwise not entirely deleted, these issues need to be fixed. Cbrittain10 (talk|contribs) 21:11, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Organization is obviously notable enough to have article, because there are 100s of such organization pages exists on Wikipedia Category:Non-governmental organisations based in India, Category:Non-profit organisations based in India. We can edit gallery of the article, otherwise I see no reason to delete this article. Last AfD was done just 6 months ago, was gone in favour of the article. --Human3015 knock knock • 02:07, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:OSE and WP:CCC. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:44, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails GNG and ORG. There are millions of NGOs in India and most of "em are not notable at all. This organization claims to be known for two events where lots of organizations already doing and are non-notable, in fact these two event does not bring this organization under-light or makes it notable. Wikipedia require significance coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. Note: Wikipedia itself is not a reliable source. This article appears to be more of a portfolio than an article as well as possibly copyvio. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 10:24, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The article should not be deleted because it is notable for conducting social awareness programmes in colleges of Haryana. It is clear from the sources that it has conducted many such programmes so it should be edited or improved but not deleted because we have many articles on Wikipedia about NGO's working in a particular region and notable in those regions but not even heard of in other regions. Some users seem to don't know "what is notable in Haryana", They tried to delete Sanatan Dharma College for the same notability reasons. Owais Khursheed (Talk to me) 11:48, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yup! including Vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies, but knowledge comes slowly and not in one day. With time and from his or her mistakes one can learn a lot and should not be blamed like foolish. Wikipedia is governed by certain polices and standards where ones plea is not considered instead bring the sources in light so that it can be considered. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 14:46, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 19:43, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yawn!!! Keeping your personal philosophies aside, I still don't see how the subject is notable. No evidence is presented here or in article by editing it. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:43, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This organisation is working for the welfare of society since 2013. Many programs and camps organised under this society. In Patna we are running a NO HORN CAMPAIGN with cooperation of patna police . Traffic S.P Pranatosh Kumar Das is with us in this campaign. This organisation is new but it notable in many part of india. So NGO NAYI UMEED article should not be deleted from wikipedia. Abh423 (Talk to me) 12:00, 30 July 2015 (UTC) — Abh423 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Note: User:Abh423 is the creator of this article. Disclosure added per WP:AFDFORMAT.[reply]

Same reply as above. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:11, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - promo advert, trying to raise funds? No coverage in reliable sources to pass WP:ORGDEPTH. Kraxler (talk) 14:53, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.