Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nandanandan Das
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:09, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Nandanandan Das (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Retired civil engineer that worked for the Government of Odisha. I have found no significant coverage, suggesting subject fails WP:BASIC/WP:GNG. No criterion in WP:NACADEMICS is met. Article was PRODed and dePRODed. Sam Sailor 07:48, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 07:49, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 07:49, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Sam, I am trying to get as much information and reference on him possible. He has significant contribution to Indian State Odisha and others. Thanks. --Pritiranjan Tripathy (talk) 05:20, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
- Further information and references added. Thanks--Pritiranjan Tripathy (talk) 10:23, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
- One book and one paper by subject as well as one paper by somebody else that quotes a paper by Das have been added. Are any sources available that talk about Das? Sam Sailor 11:28, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
- Further information and references added. Thanks--Pritiranjan Tripathy (talk) 10:23, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Sam, I am trying to get as much information and reference on him possible. He has significant contribution to Indian State Odisha and others. Thanks. --Pritiranjan Tripathy (talk) 05:20, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Some of the information in the article doesn't pass verification (e.g. 400 works authored). In my BEFORE I do not see enough coverage, and I do not see how he passes any PROF criteria. The administrative position does not seem to pass NPOL. Coverage is not close to SIGCOV.Icewhiz (talk) 13:12, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 04:07, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 04:07, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
