Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Day Alive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 04:47, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

One Day Alive (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a rock band, not properly sourced as having any strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC. The attempted notability claim here is that the song charted on a WP:BADCHART that does not pass NMUSIC's charting criterion (which is looking for IFPI-certified national charts on the order of Billboard, not "Secondary Market Rock") -- and otherwise, the article is referenced entirely to their own self-published website and content in unreliable music blogs that are not WP:GNG-worthy sources.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt them from having to have better sourcing than this. Bearcat (talk) 18:47, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with nom. Granted there are big names listed but it fails all requirements of what an article should contain to be here. 2600:8801:CA05:EF00:D41E:2828:7AA7:A58D (talk) 20:54, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 00:11, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 01:16, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no charted singles on a chart that we recognize, rest is un-RS. Appears an attempt at PROMO. They've only been around since 2020? Likely TOOSOON. I don't find any sourcing in major news outlets about this band. Oaktree b (talk) 03:57, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The Secondary Market Chart appears to be somewhat notable, but it's simply for songs getting some sort of airplay, outside of the mainstream media. For bands almost ready to hit the big time I suppose. Oaktree b (talk) 04:05, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.