Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Bora

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Joe (talk) 00:39, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Bora

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find sources. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 16:27, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 18:37, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 18:37, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bosnia and Herzegovina-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 18:37, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for lack of sources. I searched under both names given on page, using date of battle on given on page as a keyword without finding anything resembling a WP:RS.E.M.Gregory (talk) 00:56, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
comment Looking at the Italian version of the article, it appears that this was more commonly transliterated as "Operation Bura", and I found a document from the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia website [1] which talks about it at some length. I think this could be considered a primary source, and sourcing does seem to be an issue here, but it's clear that the thing happened. Mangoe (talk) 01:29, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ran a couple of searches (scholar, books, general) using sp. "Bura" - found 2 or 3 sources, all primary.E.M.Gregory (talk) 02:07, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 13:12, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Suggest renaming the article. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:12, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- no sources. Wouldn’t be surprised if this was somebody trying to start another Bicholim Conflict-esque hoax Dheltha (talk) 16:49, 28 November 2017 (UTC) N.B. This !vote was entered directly to the daily log. I have moved it to the discussion page. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:54, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.