Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PSEmu
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2010 March 15. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete, Nakon 05:14, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- PSEmu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable eumulator. No third party sources, no indications that it is notable. TJ Spyke 21:13, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 21:21, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- PSEmu Pro was later discontinued, though its plugin system is still used by all major Playstation emulators today — what do you mean no indication of notability? 70.29.213.241 (talk) 04:56, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep/ merge Seems worth including somehow as part of history and development of these systems. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:25, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 15:20, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep: Article seems slightly notable per the second lead paragraph and the legacy section, but I'm not sure if we really need it. The Earwig (User | Talk | Contributions) 20:24, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, I can't find any third-party sources on this to support an article on it. It's already listed at List of video game console emulators, otherwise I would have suggested that it be listed there as well. Raven1977Talk to meMy edits 19:08, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Valley2city‽ 01:41, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete/Redirect. No reliable sources means no article. --Chiliad22 (talk) 01:48, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
