Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raja Jitendra Public School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:50, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Raja Jitendra Public School

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Schools... always complicated. But there's zero evidence this former school was ever notable. Content is essentially what it was created as because there is no info available to add to the article, nor any indication it was noteworthy. The book link is a copy of Wikipedia. StarM 17:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. StarM 17:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. StarM 17:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. StarM 17:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

delete: the article was created in Dec 2009, since then, there have been 27 edits including the AfD nomination. It seems there was another editor who added unhelpful commentory in the mainspace, confirming existence. Other than that, all the edits were maintenance. We cant even be sure upto what class (grades) that school provided education. To become notable, the school has to pass either general notability criteria, or notability criteria for organisations. The subject fails both as there is literally zerp coverage. The book mentioned in the nomination says "contents of this book primarily consists of articles available from Wikipedia or other free sources online." —usernamekiran (talk) 18:23, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It is high time we started requiring all articles to have reliable sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:12, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Coverage & reliable sources not found. Non notable school. TheDreamBoat (talk) 09:25, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.