Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Real Art

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:35, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Real Art

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am highly dubious of the notability of these articles. They were created in 2015 by an editor with virtually no other activity on Wikipedia, and have been nothing more than one or two line stubs since then. The sources provided are either from low-rent publications, or lack substantial discussion of the article subjects. BD2412 T 03:54, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The sources are about a couple of projects the agency did, not about the agency, and I don’t think that’s enough to support an article. The projects may be notable themselves, but the agency isn’t. Mccapra (talk) 04:27, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 04:44, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 04:44, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:TNT. I can't figure out what it is. If this is spam, they got ripped off. Bearian (talk) 21:03, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the agency is never mentioned in the two main ADV magazines: Adage and Adweek.Ms4263nyu (talk) 05:01, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.