Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard "Bigo" Barnett

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per WP:SNOW, no conclusion about the redirect--Ymblanter (talk) 11:07, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Richard "Bigo" Barnett

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:BLP1E. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:41, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:41, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:41, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep for now, as Barnett is clearly not a WP:LOWPROFILE individual. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 00:46, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG as a clear example of WP:BLP1E. KidAd talk 00:51, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, no reason every person who was at the Capitol needs an article. JayJay^{What did I do?} 00:54, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete seems a clear BLP1E. Not sure if a redirect to 2021 storming of the United States Capitol is justified or not. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:56, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Archetype example of an individual notable for just one event, Although, @power~enwiki does raise a good point. Celestina007 (talk) 01:21, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for now. There are claims that the invasion of the Capitol was a false-flag event. There should be pages on the offenders giving their background of being right wing since before Trump.LachlanA (talk) 02:33, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- What? – Muboshgu (talk) 03:46, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Definitely going to need reliable sources to back up the "claims" you mention... Thrakkx (talk) 04:00, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- This sounds like an attempt to ignore WP:GNG policy in order to soapbox and right a great wrong. The 2021 storming of the United States Capitol page itself makes it clear enough with literally hundreds of citations that these were right-wing, pro-Trump protesters and not a false flag; if someone doesn't believe those sources, that's not our problem to deal with. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 09:20, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- This input is ridiculous and should frankly be salted. DÅRTHBØTTØ_(T•C) 00:57, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Factual disputes about the event should be covered in the event page, giving due weight to the conflicting views as supported by reliable sources. The facts can be stated in a paragraph or two in the event article rather than creating one-event biography stubs for alleged, but not-yet-convicted perpetrators. • Gene93k (talk) 11:16, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Definitely a wp:gng and wp:blp1e issue. Possibly also a wp:SUSPECT problem as well. BrxBrx(talk)^{(please reply with {{SUBST:re|BrxBrx}})} 03:08, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete | See WP:BLP1E Thrakkx (talk) 04:00, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. cookie monster (2020) 755 06:28, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, especially WP:BLP1E. I agree with power~enwiki and Celestina007 that a redirect to 2021 storming of the United States Capitol might be suitable. warmly, ezlev. talk 08:00, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now per nom and everyone else. Love of Corey (talk) 09:23, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the article about the storming. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 22:08, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete and redirect per WP:BLP1E. Redirect to 2021 storming of the United States Capitol. Missvain (talk) 00:29, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BLP1E; also, under the Presumption of innocence policies in the US it should be impermissible to refer to someone as a criminal without being charged first. Augend (drop a line) 00:43, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Being one of hundreds who participated in an insurrection - his only extraordinary notability being the theft of a letter - does not lend credence to viability as a page on Wikipedia. DÅRTHBØTTØ_(T•C) 00:57, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
DELETE per nom. There is nothing notable about the subject prior to rioters, including him, overtaking the Capitol. The subject has yet to be convicted. Also, allowing an un-notable subject's article to remain on Wikipedia feels like a public relations move for the subject. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 01:53, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:NOTNEWS WP:BLP1E WP:CRIME. The several arrestees should be listed in the main article perhaps. Reywas92^Talk 02:14, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I have created a one-liner in the main article on the arrestee. Albertaont (talk) 03:32, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete clear WP:BLP1E Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 04:11, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Listing new article title. Page has been moved at least twice. • Gene93k (talk) 10:59, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:BLP1E. At the moment, the only rioter partially notable for attending the event was Jake Angeli. Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 16:41, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.