Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Mosley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 03:49, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Mosley

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not state a reason for WP:N and sources do not appear to mention much that affirms notability. It appears to be written in a very WP:PROMO and WP:POV fashion as well. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 17:39, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 17:39, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:42, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: it seems the nominator might be confusing this judge with a business man. Mosely definitely seems to pass WP:NJUDGE: Politicians and judges who have held international, national, or (for countries with federal or similar systems of government) state/province–wide office, or have been members of legislative bodies at those levels, with Mosely being a federal court judge. In addition, I have found some sources sources, that might be of use in the article: [1] [2] [3]. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 18:09, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 18:10, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep but improve. The Canadian federal trial court appears to be the equivalent of a United States district court, for which we have previously determined that all judges are inherently notable. The Canadian court is described as "a superior court with nationwide jurisdiction", and has a relatively small number of judges (37 in total) to handle all of the country's business under its jurisdiction. We should probably have articles on all of them. BD2412 T 18:13, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.