Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Barnett

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Non-admin closure. TN‑X-Man 14:16, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rob Barnett

Non-notable person. This article has only primary sources and I can't find anything more substantial on Google. This article seems to me to be a thinly veiled plug for My Damn Channel, the article for which suffers from the same flaws and is co-nominated below:

Delete both unless independent verifiable sources can be found that establish notability.Nrswanson (talk) 12:13, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- raven1977 (talk) 05:06, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- raven1977 (talk) 05:06, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - coverage about him and My Damn Channel is available from mulitple independent sources including Daily Variety, TV Week, New York Post, International Herald Tribune. There's more but that should suffice. -- Whpq (talk) 19:06, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:26, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per secondary coverage shown above. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 04:10, 24 October 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Keep per sources shown above.- Mgm|^(talk) 09:06, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - concerns seem to have been addressed. Wily D 10:48, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep; sources establish notability. RockManQ ^(talk) 02:21, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 22:03, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.