Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SFML

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 21:08, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SFML

It's an open source software, so not sure it can be speedied, and my prod was removed and questioned on its discussion page, so listing here. I can see no notability at all. Minimaki (talk) 15:49, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: i recommend to keep this article - i think it will come back. It is a useful library - user that found it, was interested to use it - plus this software is stable (and not a beta). 23:00, 12 February 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.179.138.48 (talk)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 22:49, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ryan Postlethwaite 23:50, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply Nothing speaks against it coming back. Just let's wait until it is notable enough. Right now all it does is set a bad precedent for an article not claiming any notability. Whether it's useful or not is besides the point here - what is needed is sources. --Minimaki (talk) 13:18, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - SFML as an acronym brings up lots of search results, but there are multiple things called SFML. Qualifying the search with "Simple And Fast Multimedia Library" filters the results but they appear to be blogs and forum posts. No reliable sources to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 18:07, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable. I think this would have qualified for the db-web speedy; and WP:ILIKEIT, as always, is not an argument for notability. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:57, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.