Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SWiZ
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 23:42, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- SWiZ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Very stub article, not edited since 2008. I don't think it has enough notability. –ebraminiotalk 12:40, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:40, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:40, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I found no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. BTW, the home site of this software seems to be swizframework
.org, not www .swiz .cz from the article. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 21:28, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 19:01, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Lack of sources seems to render this framework not notable with regards to WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT. -- BenTels (talk) 00:39, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.