Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sex-neutral skill
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete for all the reasons given below -- The Anome (talk) 00:21, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Sex-neutral skill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete, or merge to Sex differences in humans. The only specific mention of "sex neutral skill" is in Ann Harriman's book, Women/men/management, and it appears once in passing. There is no common usage of this term and there is no published definition of it. Binksternet (talk) 04:34, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. 202.124.72.56 (talk) 08:42, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. 202.124.72.56 (talk) 08:42, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. 202.124.72.56 (talk) 08:42, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Term does not appear in the literature (GB or GS) except as noted by nom, and contents of the article is WP:SYNTH, with out-of-context quotes that do not support the interpretation given. -- 202.124.72.56 (talk) 08:46, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - yet another of his endless series of original research and synthesis "articles". --Orange Mike | Talk 16:38, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete one more of this editor's WP:SYNTH farms.--Cerejota (talk) 18:06, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.