Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silvercord
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No actual references provided; the mere assertion of google hits is not sufficient. If someone thinks a mention is relevant at Kowloon or New Kowloon, a redirect may be placed here. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:46, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Silvercord (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable retail building. Sources questioned since 2009. SchmuckyTheCat (talk) 15:50, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and improve. 218.250.159.25 (talk) 15:56, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Demonstrate notability with references, this city of 7 million has hundreds of buildings of this same size with similar stores. What's unique about this one? SchmuckyTheCat (talk)
- Kowloon with New Kowloon got only a population of around 2.5 million. 7 million is the figure for the whole territory, which includes remote island settlements, towns, hamlets and villages. 218.250.159.25 (talk) 16:04, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Demonstrate notability with references, this city of 7 million has hundreds of buildings of this same size with similar stores. What's unique about this one? SchmuckyTheCat (talk)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Has not demonstrated notability through significant coverage in reliable sources. Shrigley (talk) 04:34, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Does not meet WP:N guidelines. No source is currently cited and I do not believe there is significant coverage of the building by secondary sources. Craddocktm (talk) 21:01, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. There are 200,000 results for +silvercord +"hong kong" for Google. They are largely related to this building. For Chinese name +"新港中心", Google yields 3,520,000 results. There is no notability issues on this article. The building is located in the tourist area of Tsim Sha Tsui. Many tourist and residents visits the building every day. — HenryLi (Talk) 10:18, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.