Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social reality
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —Theopolisme 02:33, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Social reality (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article and it's contents seem to be all contained already in the article Social constructionism. Therefore it should be either deleted or merged (if there is anything to merge).88.114.154.216 (talk) 19:18, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above nomination was made at Talk:Social reality after the IP editor tagged the article for AfD, and I have copied it here. As it appears to be in good faith, I am completing the nomination process on the IP editor's behalf. Monty845 20:33, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. This appears to be a notable concept, and separate from social constructionism. Social reality is socially constructed, that doesn't mean they are the same (one answers what, the other - how). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:44, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:35, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:35, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Social constructionism88.114.154.216 (talk) 14:04, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator's comment. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 15:30, 4 November 2012 (UTC) [reply]
- Redirect The concept is a special unique concept, as stated above, but the article that exists currently reads more as a description of social constructionism. Could it be simply explained in the main article. This is also consistent with what was done with the article Socially constructed reality. 128.214.69.84 (talk) 11:32, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merging of an unreferenced stub in 2005 is not the same as merging of this developed and referenced article today. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 17:05, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- keep The concept and topic is distinct from Social constructionism, it is a central concept for example in the philosophy of John Searle.138.16.108.223 (talk) 17:12, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui 雲水 14:18, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 01:07, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notable concept per WP:NOTABLE and WP:GNG. TBrandley 01:42, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep - I think that this is very notable and well documented. There have been a number of magazine articles and newsfiller-type things. I know it's in a few textbooks. it should be kept and obviously improved. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 00:14, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
