Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space Capone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The sources found by Fieari failed to convince the other two participants in this debate. Randykitty (talk) 15:21, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Space Capone

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is heavily WP:REFBOMBed with passing mentions of individual performances. While he did release one album on Average Joes Entertainment, it seemed to get no coverage. Extensive searching turned up only social media, music sales sites, and promotional fluff. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:58, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:58, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 02:27, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:32, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - A google news search comes up with a number of articles mentioning them, not sure if these are reliable sources however. I'll just leave them here and let those more familiar with musician notability criteria judge. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] - Some of these look like coverage to me, but again, I'm not really all that familiar with musician notability requirements or what counts as reliable sources for the scene. If it would help, you can count this as a !vote of Keep, but feel free to ignore it if arguments are made to shoot these sources down. Fieari (talk) 07:15, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:15, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete more fluff than substance. Oaktree b (talk) 22:25, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.