Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SpeedUpMyPC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 23:23, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SpeedUpMyPC

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

prodded. suspected meatpuppet declined. advert, fails WP:PRODUCT Gaijin42 (talk) 15:32, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the only "sources" are really advertisements. Stedrick (talk) 20:04, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:07, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -- Joaquin008 ^(talk) 10:27, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per PC Utilities, PC News and tucows reviews linked to by vender. Sad but true: passes WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 15:51, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - A regular Wikipedian can't help but notice the section headers are: "Product Update History" "Notable Awards" and "Product Reviews". All of these have content that are unreliably sourced (primary source or advertisement). --Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 14:56, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - Per rationale above by Dmitrij D. Czarkoff. Northamerica1000^(talk) 07:04, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:Product. WP:NSOFT and WP:GNG also fail- NSOFT is an essay and does not preclude PRODUCT, and GNG is not met by provided sources. --Tgeairn (talk) 02:31, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.