Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spina CMS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 22:11, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Spina CMS

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PRODded for lack of notability, an IP editor added references and Kvng (ping) deprodded on the basis of those refs.

All of those refs are primary, therefore contributing zilch to notability by WP:NSOFT or WP:GNG standards. As written in the PROD, the only external ref I could find is this (which is clearly not enough). Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 11:03, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:50, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and this should've stayed deleted as PROD, because regardless of the sources, there's simply still nothing actually convincing for any applicable notability, only a newly started software among several. SwisterTwister talk 07:54, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 00:28, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. Refs are incidental mentions or by the developers. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. The www.lafermeduweb.net page linked above is an incidental mention linking to an article by one of the software's developers. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 21:45, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I think that link changed from when I posted it. I could swear there was a bit of text in there, not just a title and a picture. Not a reliable source anyways... Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 07:40, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.