Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sporebook

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:27, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sporebook

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Couldn't find significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject to show product meets WP:GNG NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:07, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I agree, based on a Google search. Not to detract from the potential of the product to become notable, but it doesn't meet WP:N now. The only pertinent hits I found were a mention by this article's author on his LinkedIn page, a few incorporation and intellectual property registration listings by Sporebook's owner, Paul Templeman, and a blurb Templeman placed ingenuously in an Amazon discussion thread where he tried to arouse interest in it but got no takers. Besides that, there are the usual nonsense pages, and a few pages dealing with some computer gaming system called Spore. —Largo Plazo (talk) 15:22, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- —Largo Plazo (talk) 15:35, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- —Largo Plazo (talk) 15:35, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this product. Joe Chill (talk) 19:24, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per above. wikipedia is not a promotion for you product --16x9 (talk) 22:28, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I don't see any coverage in any reliable source. This is not notable. Transmissionelement (talk) 17:23, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.