Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen W. Tayler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:18, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen W. Tayler

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NMUSIC doesn't make any mention of sound engineers or mixers, with relevant discussions concluding that being involved in producing notable music, does not make them notable i.e. WP:NOTINHERITED and therefore WP:BIO and WP:GNG apply to determining notability. Very little of the content present in the article at the moment is sourced and the few reliable sources present [1] [2] make no mention of the subject. My own searches turned up this interview in innerviews as being the best available source, but it's not a well-known reliable source for determining notability. Apart from that, all I could find were this and this from mixonline.com, which is probably a better RS, but there's not a huge amount of coverage. Definitely on the edge of notability, but I am not sure on which side and would like to know before I do any work to clean up the article. SmartSE (talk) 16:41, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. SmartSE (talk) 16:41, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:49, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:51, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I am undecided on the gentleman's notability, because finding sources for studio personnel can be tough even though they worked with lots of famous people. However, if the article survives it needs severe reduction and removal of resume-like elements. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 17:02, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:54, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.