Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sukune Inugami

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:25, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sukune Inugami

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NAUTHOR and WP:GNG. I couldn't find any independent sources with significant coverage in either English or Japanese. Her jawiki article cites an entry in a print encyclopedia which I can't verify, and I also found an interview, but a single tertiary source and an interview surely do not suffice for WP:GNG. Mlb96 (talk) 03:32, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Mlb96 (talk) 03:32, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Mlb96 (talk) 03:32, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Mlb96 (talk) 03:32, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Link20XX (talk) 03:56, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Kashimashi: Girl Meets Girl per nom, fails GNG/NAUTHOR. Admittedly, I'm not sure if this is a good redirect target (since she only did the character designs) but with her only other notable work also at AfD, it is the only possible place. Link20XX (talk) 03:56, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Inadequate sourcing to meet notability for WP:NAUTHOR and WP: GNG. Unreliable coverage and not independent. Redirect option seems to be procrastination, in regards to her only potentially-notable work also being up for deletion. NiklausGerard (talk) 03:48, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DMySon (talk) 06:38, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per attempted WP:RS searches and nom. I do not see her name as a viable search term to have as a redirect. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 13:14, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.