Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Te Puka e Mua

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Article (and many other Tokelau islands) redirected by Staszek Lem. AFD not needed anymore. (non-admin closure) Kori (@) 23:02, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Te Puka e Mua

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This Tokelauan islet is absolutely not notable and has had no references since 2010. I did some WP:BEFORE, but nothing appeared besides a book that doesn't even explain the islet, and a whole lot of websites that were entirely unhelpful. Kori (@) 19:53, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 19:56, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islands-related deletion discussions. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 19:56, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

redirect to Nukunonu. The nom could have done this themselves with this one-liner per WP:NGEO (the part about minor features) without bothering the community. Staszek Lem (talk) 20:05, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy close It turns out there were quite a few of such onliners. I've redirected them all to Nukunonu#Islands, copying the coord data there. Staszek Lem (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.