Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Volume of Self

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:14, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

The Volume of Self

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

The Volume of Self (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The band itself is not notable, this recording less so. No chart placement, no record of notability. Fails WP:NALBUM: "All articles on albums or other recordings should meet the basic criteria at the notability guidelines, with significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Redirect as ATD unlikely as band article is itself at AfD. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:53, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and United Kingdom. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:53, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:08, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

• Delete The article about the album's author was soft deleted, but had a vote saying that there was "no coverage for this musical group". I assume the same logic can be applied to this article. The first reference provides a list of songs in this album, and the second appears to be an article about this album on Blabbermouth, which is a heavy metal news site. As far as I can tell, that is the only source I could find for either of these articles, so this article doesn't meet the WP:GNG or WP:NALBUM.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.