Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ThreadWeaver

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to KDE. No consensus to delete. No prejudice against keeping as a standalone article if someone wants to expand it and add references that show it's notable on its own. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:21, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ThreadWeaver

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not particularly sure about this one, but basically every source I can find only mentions that it's in KDE to help deal with multicore processors and nothing more. I'm not sure if it's notable enough unless the notability is inherited from its inclusion with KDE 4. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:34, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with KDE, it isn't notable to stand on its own as an article UltraMagnus (talk) 16:24, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It's one of the core KDE 4 technologies and as such it deserves it's own article, IMHO. Right now, the article is a stub, but with time I'm sure it'll get expanded and be more informative. Thank you. kedadial 21:55, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:14, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to KDE. It is not notable enough to warrant its own article, ergo it should not have one, but if it is an integral part of KDE 4, then that's where it belongs. Yes, I said WP:CORP - as per the now obsolesced software guideline, this is what governs software. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:43, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.