Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time Limit (game)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Article does not demonstrate notability. Evidently, an effort made to locate reliable sourcing failed to disclose any. Notability must be independently established for articles even if they are subsets of larger groups. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:29, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Time Limit (game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No references in article. ~QuasiAbstract (talk/contrib) 16:14, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Is that really a valid criterion for deletion? Perhaps this ought to be nominated under WP:TOYS? Google search doesn't really turn up anything worthwhile. Any thoughts? Booglamay (talk) 16:33, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per lack of notability/reliable references. Luksuh 03:48, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someoneanother 10:41, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep for the moment. The article has been shown to be faulty, not necessarily irredeemable. To my understanding being a commercially released video game is considered to confer notability, and there are arcade game databases and catalogues to draw on. We'll need to go bug the local experts about this. --Kizor 12:08, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unless sources are shown to demonstrate notability. If it can never be more than an entry on an arcade game database then that's where the information should be. Someoneanother 12:43, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete First, it's copied from another website! Second, I could only find one site that mentioned it not counting the one that it was copied from and it just said it was a game. Not that it was an arcade game but just a game and nothing else. That reference was http://www.coinop.org/g.aspx/102239/Time_Limit.html and I don't know if thats considered a reliable reference.
Cool200 (talk) 14:42, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per criteria G12 - Blatant copyright infringment from this site.--Gazimoff (talk) 23:25, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't know who put in the lifted text, but I have removed that text which violates the copyright of the Killer List Of Videogames. Guroadrunner (talk) 08:48, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.