Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transbian
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:19, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Transbian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Neologism. Tried to prod this, but it was declined due to being previously created--and prodded--back in 2007. Blueboy96 02:43, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:24, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This isn't Urban Dictionary. Alex (talk) 03:38, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete For above reasons. --Confession0791 talk 03:40, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: WP:NEO and Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. --Closeapple (talk) 03:45, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, completely unsourced neologism. JIP | Talk 06:44, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable neologism. --> Gggh talk/contribs 10:41, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No evidence that this term is used within the LGBT community -- RoninBK T C 13:12, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.