Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trubiquity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and WP:SALT as this is the third deletion. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:57, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Trubiquity

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to locate substantial secondary sources for this "software solutions" company as required per WP:GNG. Previously deleted per A7 and PROD processes. VQuakr (talk) 01:34, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 05:03, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as the user didn't want to prove notability in the AFC-process and did a copy 'n paste job of the declined article! mabdul 14:30, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:41, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt. Advertising copy (article is just a product list) and meaningless, deliberately vague text: a software company providing enterprise software and software-as-a-service (SaaS) solutions for managed file transfer (MFT), business process integration and supply chain collaboration for the automotive, aerospace, advanced manufacturing, retail, finance, healthcare and consumer goods industries. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:41, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - advert, numerous press release sources used to give false impression of notability, created by an SPA. Dialectric (talk) 02:44, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can I ask what the difference between the way this page is written and this page is? Also, I added an external link that shows Siemens as recognizing this as a major PLM solution provider, as well as a reference to the Odette webpage recognizing this company as a major global OFTP2 service provider. aboz1626 (talk) 19:47, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notability on Wikipedia is defined by policies (in this case, at WP:CORP). If and how Siemens views the company is not directly relevant to a notability discussion. As to your first question, probably not much but that is also not relevant. Thanks! VQuakr (talk) 07:59, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.