Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UOX

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. With a recommendation to consider following Czar's advice and using the sources found here to add a mention of UOX to Ultima Online and then redirect this title. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 14:54, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

UOX

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable video game software with no coverage in reliable, secondary sources. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please {{ping}} me. czar 14:35, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. czar 14:55, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. czar 14:55, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now until a better article can be made. SwisterTwister talk 06:02, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:14, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@CZAR: I don't know if it counts as significant coverage, but here are some secondary sources that have mentioned UOX:

Gamespot article from December 1st, 1997 - http://www.gamespot.com/articles/ultima-goes-offline/1100-2468234/
PC World (Polish edition) mentioned UOX in an article in April 1998 - http://www.pcworld.pl/artykuly/297588/Gry.newsy.html
Computer Gaming World magazine (December 2003 printed issue, page 99 - freely downloadable in PDF format at http://www.cgwmuseum.org/galleries/index.php?year=2003&pub=2&id=233 or http://pdf.textfiles.com/zines/CGW/), mentions UOX in a section called "The Gray Area - Fun With Emulators" where the topic of server emulation is covered briefly.
makeuseof.com had an article about online server emulation/private servers on October 8th, 2014, where UOX was mentioned - http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/is-it-illegal-to-play-world-of-warcraft-on-a-private-server/

Xoduz (talk) 21:20, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The first source is brief, but could warrant a mention in the main Ultima Online article's mods section. PC World and CGW both have one-sentence descriptions of UOX that can be used as backup, though I imagine the first source covers it. Not sure whether Makeuseof is a reliable source. Anyway, thanks for pulling these. I'd support a redirect to another page that mentions UOX if there's a good place to put it based on these sources. czar 21:36, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:53, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~~delete - poorly sourced game advertisement. DangerDogWest (talk) 05:20, 26 October 2015 (UTC)~~[reply]

Struck content from confirmed sock above, per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:18, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:33, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. the references do not seem sufficiently substantial. DGG ( talk ) 04:50, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.