Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Um Vichet

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2016 March 17.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:44, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Um Vichet

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD, by IP with no rationale given. Player has not played in a fully pro league therefore fails WP:NFOOTY & has not received significant media coverage & also fails WP:GNG. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 09:23, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 09:25, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 09:25, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 09:25, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Mattythewhite (talk) 11:22, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG and NFOOTY. Article can be created later on when/if the player plays and becomes notable. -- Alexf^(talk) 12:10, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - He has not played in a fully pro league, or the Cambodian national team, nor has he received significant coverage. This article fails WP:NSPROT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:00, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. →TSU ^tp* 10:27, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 18:07, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.