Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Verari Technologies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:46, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Verari Technologies

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another promotional desktop virtualization company article, also created by a single-purpose account (User:BHmltn), almost exclusively sourced to press releases. News archive searches reveal no significant, lasting coverage of the company amidst a spattering of brief reviews of the company's product by trade publications. jæs (talk) 22:03, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 23:19, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 23:19, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Clearly violates WP:NOTE, and probably WP:SPAM. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 23:36, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 02:12, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This is real company. Has significant Ghits of the nonPR variety. Of course the article needs to be majorly reworked to address the concerns raised above. The "Cirrascale" issue also needs clarity. Annette46 (talk) 13:56, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Could you share some of those hits that you believe reliably indicate notability? jæs (talk) 02:02, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
delete "this is a real company" is not a compelling argument per Wikipedia:EXIST. Sure it might be real but is it notable and to verifiable sources exist. If above poster adds reliable sources to article will reconsider. 65.29.47.55 (talk) 06:00, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:41, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The google news link in the "Find sources" above provides links to sufficient material to meet WP:GNG. Per "The demise of San Diego's Verari Systems and its resurrection as Verari Technologies,"[1] there likely is plenty written about the failures resulting in the layoff of 223 employees. I'm amaze that anyone having skeletons in the closet would want a Wikipedia article. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 16:23, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.