Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where's Olivia?
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:29, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Where's Olivia? (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable direct-to-video sitcom, search returns only false positives. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:36, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as a part of a non-notable walled garden created by Loloike. Salih (talk) 09:52, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I don't think being a walled garden means it is qualified for CSD, so that is why I sent it to AfD. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:57, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- True, being a walled garden does not by itself qualified for CSD, but in this case the user is attempting to create a group of articles about totally non-notable people, such as this and a direct-to-video sitcom. Salih (talk) 10:34, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I only mean to nominate the actual sitcom anyway, not the actors, I am fine with the CSDs on those. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:37, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- True, being a walled garden does not by itself qualified for CSD, but in this case the user is attempting to create a group of articles about totally non-notable people, such as this and a direct-to-video sitcom. Salih (talk) 10:34, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I don't think being a walled garden means it is qualified for CSD, so that is why I sent it to AfD. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:57, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:32, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I see no evidence of notability. David V Houston (talk) 17:44, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
