Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XCOMP
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:26, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- XCOMP (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. // Timothy :: talk 00:04, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 00:04, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 00:04, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete It does not seem to pass the notability criteria. Ktrimi991 (talk) 23:27, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 12:27, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (Talk) 04:49, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (Talk) 04:49, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete non notable --Devokewater @ 13:13, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete insignificant.Light2021 (talk) 22:52, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.